When consensus failed, Hamilton argued, the “public business” must “go forward.” Allowing a minority faction to stop the majority invited all kinds of mischief and interference, he warned, explaining that such a system “gives greater scope to foreign corruption, as well as to domestic faction, than that which permits the sense of the majority to decide. In Federalist 22, Hamilton takes on the advocates of supermajority rule, explaining that “what at first sight may seem a remedy, is, in reality, a poison.” It would be wrong “to subject the sense of the greater number to that of the lesser,” because if “a pertinacious minority can control the opinion of a majority,” the result would be “tedious delays continual negotiation and intrigue contemptible compromises of the public good.” Decision-makers would sometimes fail to find consensus, he acknowledged, since there are times when issues “will not admit of accommodation.” But in such instances, if the minority was allowed to block the majority, the government’s “situation must always savor of weakness, sometimes border upon anarchy,” Hamilton wrote. “When it was time to sell the Constitution to the American people, the Framers made majority rule central to their argument, especially in the Federalist Papers, which were authored by Madison, Hamilton, and John Jay. Kill Switch: The Rise of the Modern Senate and the Crippling of American Democracy On May 26, 2006, by a vote of 57 to 36, he was confirmed to the U.S.” His hearings were contentious, but he made it through the committee.68 Intimidated by Republicans’ continued threats to go nuclear, Democrats declined to filibuster him when his nomination came to the floor. Daring Democrats to block him again and give Republicans a reason to go nuclear, Bush renominated him in 2005. An active member of the Federalist Society, he had been nominated in 2003, before the Gang’s deal was struck, but the Senate declined to confirm him due to his extreme partisanship and lack of qualifications. His qualifications were primarily political, having been an assistant to Special Investigator Kenneth Starr before becoming staff secretary to President George W. law enforcement treats the telephone network.“One of the controversial Bush nominees the Gang of Fourteen deal failed to stop was a partisan operative with no judicial experience. Nolle says that even though the Internet could come under attack, a ‘kill switch’ is “inconsistent” with the way U.S. But I’m not aware of anything that gives the government the authority to cut off telephony.” treats the telephone network, we prioritize calls and communications for public service emergency services and things like that. “You have to look at the Internet as a form of the public network,” says Tom Nolle, president of consultancy CIMI Corp. It gets even better: Barr points out that the bill, which has been signed into law by President Biden, states that the kill switch, which is referred to as a safety device, must passively. This may help governments protect citizens as well as government assets, the report suggests. The OECD report recommends creation of international computer emergency response teams that have a more holistic view of unfolding events than national agencies. And since most targets in a cyberwar or military conflict are private sector organizations responsible for “critical national infrastructure” - communications, energy, finance, food, health, transportation and water - the government depriving them of Internet communications would be even more detrimental, the report suggests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |